Governance

The Group will establish effective governance frameworks to ensure the transparency, objectivity, and fairness of the management of the companies and earn society’s trust everywhere it operates. The Board of Directors recognizes fiduciary responsibilities to all stakeholders, including shareholders and investors, and supervises the Group’s overall management by taking responsibility for the Company’s sustainable growth and maximization of mid- to long-term shareholder value (MSV) through the appropriate exercise its authority.

Analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors

Issues and initiatives for FY2025

Areas that required stronger initiatives in FY2025 Main initiatives in FY2025
1) Enrichment of discussion on growth strategy
Further increase opportunities for and enrich the discussion on future strategy to facilitate the executive team’s realization of the growth strategy.
  • We held in-person brainstorming sessions at the beginning of the fiscal year and in September to deepen discussions. In addition, we leveraged forums such as the Meeting of the Independent Directors and training session with overseas investors to broaden perspectives and enhance the quality of discussions on growth strategy.
2) Thorough engagement in succession planning
Establish a more sustainable management foundation, review and draw up plans to identify and develop talents.
  • In addition to understanding the status of human capital across the Group, we discussed enhancing succession planning through ongoing communication with key members of management.
3) Further upgrading of the “Audit on Audit” framework
Fine-tune the audit framework to be better aligned with our Asset Assembler model.
  • Further developed the “Audit on Audit” framework suited to the Asset Assembler model, which included updating the internal rules around the Audit Committee.

Evaluation for FY2025 and issues for FY2026

Guidelines for conducting FY2025 evaluation

Evaluation subjects

All Directors for FY2025: 9 persons
Managing Executive Officer, General Counsel (GC): 1 person

Methodology

Led by the Board Chair and the Chairperson of the Nominating Committee, we conducted the evaluation survey using a questionnaire while we appointed Towers Watson K.K. (WTW) as an independent third-party evaluator. Based on WTW’s analysis and evaluation of the survey results, the Board of Directors discussed the effectiveness of the Board.

Questionnaire items

The questionnaire covered topics such as the composition of the Board of Directors, preparation and operation of meetings, quality of deliberations, contributions by Directors, monitoring of execution, and the composition and operation of each committee.

Evaluation process

  1. Distributed the questionnaire to each Director and Executive Officer, and received responses
  2. WTW analyzed and evaluated the survey results
  3. Reported on and discussed the effectiveness evaluation at the Board of Directors meeting
Overview of the FY2025 evaluation results

Based on the analysis and evaluation of the survey by WTW, the Board of Directors concluded that the Board was generally effective in FY2025.

Summary of evaluation

  • It was confirmed that understanding of MSV and the Asset Assembler model has been firmly established as a shared foundation for deliberations at the Board of Directors.
  • Regarding discussions on growth strategy, in addition to securing sufficient opportunities for discussion, deliberations were enhanced by incorporating multifaceted perspectives.
  • From the perspective of supporting a sustainable management structure, the need for continued consideration of succession planning was shared, and discussions were made.
  • Progress was made in developing an audit framework suited to the Asset Assembler model, leading to clearer definition of the framework supporting “Audit on Audit.”
Areas that require stronger initiatives in FY2026
  • Further enrichment of discussion on growth strategy
    Contribute to the execution of strategies by the executive team and to the enhancement of the market confidence.
  • Thorough engagement in succession planning
    Reinforce talent identification and development for a management structure suitable for the next stage of growth.
  • Further upgrading of the “Audit on Audit” framework
    Operate “Audit on Audit” aligning with and effective in the Asset Assembler model.
This website requires some functions similar to those of cookies.
If you allow our cookies, we use them to collect statistical data about your visit to improve our service. Videos are also presented by using YouTube. Cookies and other means are used only when you opt to watch videos. If you do not allow our cookies, only technical cookies are used.
Click/tap here for details.