M&A Strategy
M&A basic policy
Our M&A basic policy is to promote M&A activities by leveraging our three pillars of competitive advantage underlying our Asset Assembler model: (1) our ability to harness the low-funding cost, (2) our ability to maintain and boost the EPS contribution from assets companies without intervention, and (3) our unique appeal to management-class talents who empathize with our modus operandi. Based on this policy, our current focus lies in promoting M&A activities in the paint and adjacencies areas, which offer a compelling risk/return advantage. Notably, the decorative paints market represents a significant portion of the paint and coatings market. It operates on a local production for local consumption basis, with each country and market adopting unique business models encompassing raw material procurement, consumer preferences, sales networks, and environmental regulations.
Apart from facing a low threat of substitute products, paints, particularly decorative paints, exhibit significant regional characteristics. Critical success factors in this market are as follows: (1) strong brand power; (2) a well-established distribution network; and (3) the establishment of operations with local expertise. Achieving the No. 1 market share based on these factors provides a substantial advantage, making it challenging for competitors to reverse the trend.
This market leadership enables further expansion in market share, followed by increased profits, creating a virtuous cycle of growth.
- Characteristics of the paint and adjacencies businesses
-
-
Businesses characterized by local production for local consumption Customer needs differ across countries and regions
-
High entry barriers A small number of top-ranking brands dominate the markets
-
Adjacencies have several areas of attractive markets We supply both paint products and adjacency products in a one-stop fashion
-
The paint market offers the potential for continuous growth centered on architectural paints, driven by population growth and urbanization, among other factors.
The key points of our M&A based on Asset Assembler model is outlined in the table below. We select acquisition targets which (1) contain low risk and stable earning flow, (2) possess strong brand and talented management teams, and (3) is expected to show EPS accretion from year one. Key partner companies which joined our Group since FY2014 have achieved strong growth in both high growth and mature markets.
We will strive to maintain our track record of accumulating successful M&A deals to widely convey the benefits of joining our Group to acquisition targets, while at the same time building expectations from the stock market as a company capable of consistently accumulating and expanding EPS.
Key points of the M&A strategy
Targets ① Business segments: Paint (decorative/industrial), adjacencies and Paint++
② Geography: Not limited
③ Potential targets: Strong corporate/product brand and excellent management team
① Entities of low risk and stable protability as represented by paint and adjacencies
② No restrictions in terms of target locations as long as acquisition contributes to MSV. Distant location to be carefully examined
③ Continue to build up assets leveraging strengths of our three pillars of competitive advantageOur Strengths ① Financial soundness
② Ability to finance in Japan, with stable currency and stable market
③ Full access to the Nippon Paint Group’s platform
④ Excellent management teams enabling autonomous and decentralized business model
① Stable cash generating ability and strong financial position
② Low interest rate borrowings, safety and liquidity of the stock market
③ Sharing expertise, products, and technologies within the Group
④ Minimize PMI riskFinancial Discipline ① Contribution to EPS
② ROIC*1>WACC*2
③ Sufficient leverage capacity
④ Debt financing prioritized; equity financing also an option
① Aim to achieve EPS accretion in Year 1 after acquisition
② Take capital efficiency into consideration
③ Secure financial soundness to prepare for future M&As
④ EPS accretion also a must in rare case of equity financing
M&A selection process
The diagram on the below illustrates our M&A selection process. After creating a long list of target companies, we assign priorities, examine feasibility, and hold thorough discussions, going into details such as the timing and proposal structure of M&A.
When choosing targets, the sole criterion is their potential contribution to MSV. Notably, personal egos, such as the desire to just pursue size or personal achievements, do not influence our decisions. For our Company, achieving the title of the world's largest company in terms of sales would hold little significance if the journey towards that goal were to harm shareholder value.
Therefore, when we examine a specific acquisition, we make judgment after holding multifaceted discussions on the degree of PMI led by Partner Company Groups and other risks involved with sound vigilance at all times. In the context of “Asset Assembler” model, human capital holds significant importance. To mitigate risks effectively, we have implemented mechanisms that involve commitments with local management and succession plans.
One essential financial discipline for us is to contribute to EPS accretion from the very first year. We refrain from making overly optimistic assumptions about justifying acquisition synergies, e.g. hoping for positive EPS only after three years of acquisition.
In our value calculations, we take into account not only metrics like PER and EV/EBITDA but also evaluate how executing the deal will impact the cushion in the Group's balance sheet.
A Platform that drives growth of both existing businesses and acquired companies
The strength of our platform based on Asset Assembler model lies in its ability to generate growth synergies for both existing and acquired businesses. This leads to higher earnings growth compared to the pre-M&A period. Notably, our approach goes beyond mere costcutting synergies often seen in the Western model.
Unlike many failed M&A by Japanese companies where impairments are often observed after several years post acquisition, all of our deals since FY2019 when we accelerated our M&A efforts have surpassed our expectations. This success in of itself is the evidence of our strength in platform. In the following, I will elaborate on the key success factors.
Co-Presidents maintain constant communication with local management while delegating authority and defining responsibilities for achieving results only after establishing a high level of trust based on factors such as their track record and commitment to growth. A streamlined decision-making process with local approval is adopted, ensuring swift and effective actions. Having management dispatched from headquarters can create a disconnect with the local staff, while a top management composed solely of e.g. Japanese may lead to a loss of motivation among talented local employees.
The role of our headquarters is to offer support to talented local management. In addition to fostering a direct consultative relationship with Co-Presidents, we provide Japanese yen-based funds for growth investments, leverage the Nippon Paint brands, and facilitate an autonomous collaboration platform among the partner companies. Of course, we do maintain certain aspects of control. Co-Presidents oversee the governance of our key subsidiaries. Headquarters retains its say in certain level of capital expenditures, as well as compensation and appointment/dismissal of CEO-class senior executives at subsidiaries. The strength of our platform extends beyond associates collaborating across borders, if needed, to achieve the common goal of MSV. It also encompasses active sharing of growth strategies for countries with both mature and emerging markets, brands and know-how from existing and new businesses, and raw material purchases among partner companies. Moreover, these partner companies have the freedom to make choices without being forced by headquarters. This blend of trust and accountability for results empowers us to foster growth through both existing businesses and M&A.
As a result, local management with a passion for growth can fully showcase their management skills, leading to an increase in companies that express interest in joining our Group.
Autonomous and decentralized management based on strong Trust in partner companies
Nippon Paint Group is pursuing autonomous growth through collaboration and cooperation among Group partner companies in each region based on autonomous and decentralized management based on Trust with our partner companies around the world.
M&A track record
Our key partner companies, which joined our Group since FY2014 based on our selection criteria for acquisition targets which (1) contain low risk and stable earning flow contributing to MSV, regardless of business categories or regions, (2) possess strong brand and talented management teams, and (3) are expected to show EPS accretion from year one, have achieved strong growth in both high growth and mature markets.
(Decorative paints)
Dunn-Edwards
- 2017
37.4 bn yen - 2022
65.7 bn yen
+47.2%
DuluxGroup
- 2019
134.9 bn yen - 2022
206.6 bn yen
+53.2%
Betek Boya
- 2019
28.8 bn yen - 2022
70.5 bn yen
+144.7%
PT Nipsea
- 2020
30.3 bn yen - 2022
52.3 bn yen
+72.7%
NIPSEA Group
(2014: Consolidation
2021: Full integration)
- 2014
236.5 bn yen - 2022
708.5 bn yen
+199.6%
Vital Technical
Cromology
No.2 (France, Portugal)
- 2021
109.1 bn yen - 2022
117.3 bn yen
+7.6%
JUB
- 2021
109.1 bn yen - 2022
117.3 bn yen
+7.6%
Five Chinese
automotive
subsidiaries
NPT